Monday, May 7, 2012
Thursday, April 26, 2012
Movie Review #3
Ink by Jamin Winans
1) Provide a description of the film. Discuss the plot and characters and how they influenced the film. Was the plot line or character development more important? Why?
In the film "Ink", directed by Jamin Winans, we see a war. A war between two forces, fighting over our souls. One fights for good, by providing good dreams, feelings, and images in an attempt to thwart the their opponents, the Incubus. The Incubus are a group of people who attempt to steal souls human beings through nightmares and feelings of maliciousness. The movie follows a little girl, Emma, who was kidnapped by a cloaked, grotesque man named Ink. Ink wants to give her to the Incubus so he can join their group. The only way to save her from losing her soul forever to the Incubus is a group of storytellers, who's job is to disrupt the incubi that are trying to corrupt the father John by making him do business instead of caring for his daughter. At the hospital is where Emma's earthly body is held, John must confront himself with who he has become since the passing of his wife and remember who he once was when his wife was still alive, more than once.
The character development was the most important. The plot was set in stone from the beginning and never really changed. The whole film is about character development. We even see sinister forces like Ink go through a major character change, good or bad, that effectively changes the entire supposed outcome. Other characters, like the band of storytellers tasked with getting the girl back and rescuing John from the Incubus that are slowly corrupting his mind, go through emotional gauntlets that rarely let up, leaving them to bond closely with each other, strengthening their relationship while they desperately fight for the lives and souls of a man and his young daughter.
2) Think critically about how the film was shot, directed, use of lighting, etc. What do you think was effective in the making of the film? What took away or could have been done differently to enhance the film?
The film was shot in two ways. One for the real world, and one for the spiritual. The real world just uses more lighter colors, and everything seems bland and everyone is boring. The spiritual world is used in a couple ways. When the incubus are nearby, the screen goes greenish and highlights glowing lights, such as the incubus' glasses. When the storytellers are in control, the light goes heavenly, and the colors are cool. This is relaxing, especially for the viewer as the incubus and their darkening aura around them can leave the viewer feeling suffocated.
3) What is you overall opinion of the film? Would you recommend it? Why/why not?
Overall, I highly reccomend this film to anyone who is a fan of cult classics like "Donnie Darko", "The Matrix", or "Pan's Labyrinth". It provides a story with iconic characters like Ink, Liev, and even insignificant characters like the ugly bride stuck in the spiritual world, obsessed with vanity and treats any women with more beauty than her cruelly, are rememberable. The film is also a good metaphor for the battle between evil and good on different levels, such inner thoughts like depression and denial, two of which John experiences consistently.
In the film "Ink", directed by Jamin Winans, we see a war. A war between two forces, fighting over our souls. One fights for good, by providing good dreams, feelings, and images in an attempt to thwart the their opponents, the Incubus. The Incubus are a group of people who attempt to steal souls human beings through nightmares and feelings of maliciousness. The movie follows a little girl, Emma, who was kidnapped by a cloaked, grotesque man named Ink. Ink wants to give her to the Incubus so he can join their group. The only way to save her from losing her soul forever to the Incubus is a group of storytellers, who's job is to disrupt the incubi that are trying to corrupt the father John by making him do business instead of caring for his daughter. At the hospital is where Emma's earthly body is held, John must confront himself with who he has become since the passing of his wife and remember who he once was when his wife was still alive, more than once.
2) Think critically about how the film was shot, directed, use of lighting, etc. What do you think was effective in the making of the film? What took away or could have been done differently to enhance the film?
The film was shot in two ways. One for the real world, and one for the spiritual. The real world just uses more lighter colors, and everything seems bland and everyone is boring. The spiritual world is used in a couple ways. When the incubus are nearby, the screen goes greenish and highlights glowing lights, such as the incubus' glasses. When the storytellers are in control, the light goes heavenly, and the colors are cool. This is relaxing, especially for the viewer as the incubus and their darkening aura around them can leave the viewer feeling suffocated.
3) What is you overall opinion of the film? Would you recommend it? Why/why not?
Overall, I highly reccomend this film to anyone who is a fan of cult classics like "Donnie Darko", "The Matrix", or "Pan's Labyrinth". It provides a story with iconic characters like Ink, Liev, and even insignificant characters like the ugly bride stuck in the spiritual world, obsessed with vanity and treats any women with more beauty than her cruelly, are rememberable. The film is also a good metaphor for the battle between evil and good on different levels, such inner thoughts like depression and denial, two of which John experiences consistently.
Thursday, April 19, 2012
Good Will Hunting Review
1) Describe the Film
2) What did you notice about the writing in the film.
4) This film won an Academy Award for Best Writing (Original Screenplay). Do you think it deserved this award? Why or Why not?
The film is about a trouble young man who works as a janitor at M.I.T. He then gets involved with one of the teachers when Will, the protagonist, solvs a very difficult problem on a chalk board in a hallway. Professor Lambeau hunts down Will after catching him solving another one of his problems, and finds him in a jail cell, where he has been charged with assault, for a fight he had with a group of other locals. The professor takes him out of jail and his rough life and teaches him, and brings him to multiple therapists, where, an old friend of Lambeau, who is also from the same rough neighborhood as Will, works with him. Sean Maguire, played by Robin Williams, works with Will on his issues with other people and using his talented gift of solving mathematical equations that others could barely comprehend to get out of his violent neighborhood.
2) What did you notice about the writing in the film.
The writing was simple. It was short lines, with little words. The diction was simple, as it should be because some characters in the film were clearly uneducated after high school. The cussing, in my opinion, is necessary. Everyone cusses now and then, and not putting it in the movie, especially for people from Boston, is a crime. It also adds another part of the "rough life" factor that Will has.
3) What was a favorite line from the film? Why?
My favorite line is when Sean, Robin Williams' character, after being verbally ripped apart by Will the first time they met, gives it right back to Will, and shows his dominance over Will. Showing Will his not unlike others, and the he himself, Sean, lived a very similar life as Will.
4) This film won an Academy Award for Best Writing (Original Screenplay). Do you think it deserved this award? Why or Why not?
Yes, it deserved the award. It's a great screenplay that accurately shows gifted youth with troubled lives. Furthermore, it shows people who have had to live with not even a respectable father or mother. And why people like Will, end up with people like Chuckie Sullivan, played by Ben Affleck, who is a friend of Will Hunting in the film. It's also a different take on boy genius, done in an urban setting.
Thursday, March 29, 2012
Thursday, March 8, 2012
Film Review #2
TRON: Legacy
1) Provide a description of the film. Discuss the plot and characters and how they influenced the film. Was the plot line or character development more important? Why?
TRON:Legacy is a film about a boy, Sam Flynn who, after losing his father many many years before, receives contact from his dad, Kevin Flynn he thought to be dead. Sam decides to investigate the source of the message and ends up at his fathers old arcade. At the arcade, Sam discovers secret room where apparently Kevin had been working from quite sometime. While sitting at the desk, Sam accidentally turns on a machine behind him, which sends him into what is known as "the grid". In the grid, Sam discovers a new world that his father was trying to create many years before. It turns out however, that Clue, Kevin's artificial intelligence equal, has taken over and is trying to create "the perfect system". In his quest to create the perfect system, Clue runs Kevin out of his creation and now has set his eyes on the real world, where he seeks to eliminate all imperfections, and as Kevin puts it "What is more imperfect then our world?" Kevin also discovers a new race whilst on the grid. This race is formed by an "isomorphic algorithm". This new algorithm basically can solve the world's problems such as diseases, hunger and what not. Clue, in his quest for perfection, slaughters all of the "isos", but only one remains, Quorra. Kevin and Sam must now stop Clue from reaching the real world and destroying at all, and they must save Quorra, the best possible thing that could happen to humanity.
Overall, the plot line was what drove the story. Sam and Kevin do the whole father son deal that has been done many times over, but this idea of a A.I., threatening to set the world straight through violence and dictatorship and that Kevin has created something that the world is in dire need of is original and thought provoking. This greater good is what motivates characters, even those that are as stubborn as Kevin, to do something about it.
2) Think critically about how the film was shot, directed, use of lighting, etc. What do you think was effective in the making of the film? What took away or could have been done differently to enhance the film?
The film was shot entirely in front of a green screen, save for a few reality scenes. The lighting was simple, and everything had a glow. The bad guys were printed with orange, good were white. But the whole idea of being inside a computer was adapted beautifully that even some nature lovers could enjoy. The film was shot like any other film, but what really made it was the special effects. The special effects of the cars, airplanes, explosions looking like little pixels bursting in air, and the make up and colors of certain characters to give them the computer feel was incredible. Nothing really could have been done different, except maybe more scenes of the "games" or history on how Kevin got stuck on the grid and how Clue came to power would have been great. But that is asking a lot considering how much they have already done.
3) What is you overall opinion of the film? Would you recommend it? Why/why not?
Overall, it was great. The soundtrack was made by the infamous french artists "Daft Punk" which only made it better. I highly recommend this film to anyone who has ever been fascinated by technology in any way shape or form because it brings a new thinking to how technology evolves and never stops evolving and what could happen if not controlled properly. If you haven't seen it, you're missing out.
Friday, March 2, 2012
The Artist
1) Describe the film.
The film was about a very talented actor during the silent film era, who is at his prime. During his life of popularity, he encounters a fan, who in turn tries out to become an actor. With the motivation of George Valentine, the male character, Peppy Miller makes her way towards stardom through "talking" pictures, while George is left in the dust and forgotten. George attempts at becoming his own director, but the movie fails in a bust and he eventually goes broke, especially after the stock market crash. With Peppy Miller becoming ever more famous and George Valentine becomes ever so depressed, things start to spiral downward and George Valentine's pride could drive him to the ground.
2) How is the story driven? By the characters or plot?
The story is driving by both. We get into the very depressing and emotional part due to Valentine's pride, dragging him down. However, he turns around because of the character, Peppy Miller, Valetine's love, brings he back to life. The plot line also drives the story. With the rising fame of Peppy Miller in her talkies, and the downward spiral Valentine endurs after being left in the technological dust. Because of this exchange of success, Valentine's pride gets the best of him.
3) Talk about the cinematography. How was the use of lighting, acting, camera angles scene development used to help enhance the film?
With only black and white, the best effects to add were the contrast of light and dark. One scene where this is effectively used is in the shot where Valentine knocks over the camera, and a beam of light shines towards the audience's perspective, giving the room a feeling of chaos and disorder, which was exactly what was happening.
4) What was you favorite scene from the film? Why? Describe the scene as well as how it was shot.
My favorite scene was in the beginning, where we see Valentine's true nature. He is a jokester but also at the same time very pompous and self-centered. We also see in the scene the showing of Valentine's movie. The angle from which the camera is positioned inside the theater experiments with filming film and capturing the audience's opinions and emotions toward the film.
5) What is the experience of watching a silent film like? How does it relate to watching a "talkie"?
I first thought it was boring, and never would have watched it if I wasn't recommended by some many people. It took more of looking at the characters and figuring things out for yourself on what is happening in the movie. It's more difficult to understand and though-provoking. You eventually get really into the film because you are focused on it so much, increasing your feelings toward the characters. Compared to a talkie, it is more interactive. It's not like a "talkie", where everything is told to the audience, resulting in a lack of thinking and interest in the piece.
6) Would you encourage others to view the film? Why or why not?
I highly recommend others to watch it. Even if you can't stand silent films, it's important to understand where movies came from and not only get a history lesson, but experience a different work of art instead of just common, mindless humor that most production companies spew out today.
The film was about a very talented actor during the silent film era, who is at his prime. During his life of popularity, he encounters a fan, who in turn tries out to become an actor. With the motivation of George Valentine, the male character, Peppy Miller makes her way towards stardom through "talking" pictures, while George is left in the dust and forgotten. George attempts at becoming his own director, but the movie fails in a bust and he eventually goes broke, especially after the stock market crash. With Peppy Miller becoming ever more famous and George Valentine becomes ever so depressed, things start to spiral downward and George Valentine's pride could drive him to the ground.
2) How is the story driven? By the characters or plot?
The story is driving by both. We get into the very depressing and emotional part due to Valentine's pride, dragging him down. However, he turns around because of the character, Peppy Miller, Valetine's love, brings he back to life. The plot line also drives the story. With the rising fame of Peppy Miller in her talkies, and the downward spiral Valentine endurs after being left in the technological dust. Because of this exchange of success, Valentine's pride gets the best of him.
3) Talk about the cinematography. How was the use of lighting, acting, camera angles scene development used to help enhance the film?
With only black and white, the best effects to add were the contrast of light and dark. One scene where this is effectively used is in the shot where Valentine knocks over the camera, and a beam of light shines towards the audience's perspective, giving the room a feeling of chaos and disorder, which was exactly what was happening.
4) What was you favorite scene from the film? Why? Describe the scene as well as how it was shot.
My favorite scene was in the beginning, where we see Valentine's true nature. He is a jokester but also at the same time very pompous and self-centered. We also see in the scene the showing of Valentine's movie. The angle from which the camera is positioned inside the theater experiments with filming film and capturing the audience's opinions and emotions toward the film.
5) What is the experience of watching a silent film like? How does it relate to watching a "talkie"?
I first thought it was boring, and never would have watched it if I wasn't recommended by some many people. It took more of looking at the characters and figuring things out for yourself on what is happening in the movie. It's more difficult to understand and though-provoking. You eventually get really into the film because you are focused on it so much, increasing your feelings toward the characters. Compared to a talkie, it is more interactive. It's not like a "talkie", where everything is told to the audience, resulting in a lack of thinking and interest in the piece.
6) Would you encourage others to view the film? Why or why not?
I highly recommend others to watch it. Even if you can't stand silent films, it's important to understand where movies came from and not only get a history lesson, but experience a different work of art instead of just common, mindless humor that most production companies spew out today.
Tuesday, February 28, 2012
A Day
1) Describe your film
My film is a brief overview of what goes on at school throughout a day. I mostly use creative shots along with music from "The xx" to create a feeling of nostalgia from our fast lives.
2) What was the mood you were going for?
The modd I was going for was somewhere around the feeling of a day at school. The hustle and bustle and sometimes stressful feeling that school provokes.
3) Do you think you were effective in representing the mood? Why/How?
In a way, yes. I did capture a fair amount of what goes on at Pinewood. But it can be also be confusing as the emotion isn't clear as I would like it to be.
4) How did the use of sound or music influence the film?
The music was the main force behind the film. It added more to the emotion of going through life and gave life to the still shots of nature.
5) Would you do anything different?
I would probably add more scenes and choose a different song that was longer, to try and encompass even more of what goes on at school.
6) What are you most proud of?
I'm most proud of the fact that I got up at 6 am to go film the sunrise and get the shots I needed. It was the first time I ever did something like that. Probably won't be the last.
Tuesday, February 14, 2012
Film Review #1
Drive
1) Provide a description of the film. Discuss the plot and characters and how they influenced the film. Was the plot line or character development more important? Why?
The film starts off with a young man, in his late 20s or early 30s, apparently driving for two criminals, who just robbed some building in L.A. He then makes his way through L.A., avoiding all the police searching for the him. Realizing that he will get caught, he escapes by ditching the car the Clippers game and blending in with the crowd, walking right by police. We figure out that doing under the table jobs and being a movie stunt driver is his job, all the while working at a auto shop as well. Eventually, the shop owner of where he works, involves him in stock car racing, the owner and financer of the team is a mob member. "Kid" eventually befriends his neighbor, Irene, played by Carey Mulligan and her young son, Benicio. We learn that the father is in prison. "Kid" and Irene become very good friends and "Kid" watches out for Benicio, acting as a father figure. The father in prison is released and this separates "Kid" and Irene. However, after the father, Standard, notices that "Kid" was taking care of his family, he thanks him and invites "Kid" over to dinner. One day, "Kid" stumbles upon Standard and Benicio, where Standard has been beaten up by thugs and Benicio is hiding in the corner. We learn Standard is in debt to some bad people, and "Kid" decides to help him out by being his getaway driver for heist Standard is supposed to commit, in order to settle his debts with the mob. The heist was a setup and Benicio is killed, but "Kid" gets away. "Kid" now has the mob's money, and has made some enemies that he doesn't want. We also learn that the mob "Kid" and Standard stole from the mob who sponsors his stock car racing. "Kid" now must figure out how to protect Irene and Benicio, and settle the debt he has mistakenly made.
The character development was minimal. It is classified as a neo-noir film. This genre is all about a main character who is a "badass" but the audience knows little about, adding to the mysterious effect of the character. The most important was the plot. You at first think it is going one way, but then changes after we learn of Standard's debts he must pay. Everything must be put on hold before anyone can move on with their life.
2) Think critically about how the film was shot, directed, use of lighting, etc. What do you think was effective in the making of the film? What took away or could have been done differently to enhance the film?
The film was shot incredibly. Car movies are common, and sometimes can be boring because the same exact shots of cars flipping over and exploding are overused. But this movie introduces brand new cinematography that has never been before. Or at least I haven't. Lighting was sort of 80s-ish, with purple and blue lighting on the character's faces at night. The most effective was probably the cinematography. It is a great source for anyone who is looking for new ways to shoot, should watch. My favorite two shots were 1) Where "Kid" sees two thugs walking by in a parking garage. The camera is placed inside the car, in the passenger seat, looking out at the driver and the two thugs walking by. Then the car pulls in, all the while maintaing view of the thugs. My next favorite is when "Kid" is going to settle debts and wearing a mask to keep is identity hidden. The angle is from inside a pizza parlor, looking out, where we see "Kid" walk up to the door and stare inside, deciding what his next move would be. Keep a look out for those two when watching it. Another key factor was the music, the music was this kind of 80s synthesizer based soundtrack. It worked well with the theme and makes you want to listen the same music when you drive. Nothing could have been done differently. It was a great homage to noir films by Nicolas Refn.
3) What is you overall opinion of the film? Would you recommend it? Why/why not?
Highly recommend it. While the film is quite artsy and can be boring, not understandable, and "weird" in a way, it was fantastic because of each shot was taken into careful consideration and made the film art, instead of simply entertainment.
1) Provide a description of the film. Discuss the plot and characters and how they influenced the film. Was the plot line or character development more important? Why?
The film starts off with a young man, in his late 20s or early 30s, apparently driving for two criminals, who just robbed some building in L.A. He then makes his way through L.A., avoiding all the police searching for the him. Realizing that he will get caught, he escapes by ditching the car the Clippers game and blending in with the crowd, walking right by police. We figure out that doing under the table jobs and being a movie stunt driver is his job, all the while working at a auto shop as well. Eventually, the shop owner of where he works, involves him in stock car racing, the owner and financer of the team is a mob member. "Kid" eventually befriends his neighbor, Irene, played by Carey Mulligan and her young son, Benicio. We learn that the father is in prison. "Kid" and Irene become very good friends and "Kid" watches out for Benicio, acting as a father figure. The father in prison is released and this separates "Kid" and Irene. However, after the father, Standard, notices that "Kid" was taking care of his family, he thanks him and invites "Kid" over to dinner. One day, "Kid" stumbles upon Standard and Benicio, where Standard has been beaten up by thugs and Benicio is hiding in the corner. We learn Standard is in debt to some bad people, and "Kid" decides to help him out by being his getaway driver for heist Standard is supposed to commit, in order to settle his debts with the mob. The heist was a setup and Benicio is killed, but "Kid" gets away. "Kid" now has the mob's money, and has made some enemies that he doesn't want. We also learn that the mob "Kid" and Standard stole from the mob who sponsors his stock car racing. "Kid" now must figure out how to protect Irene and Benicio, and settle the debt he has mistakenly made.
The character development was minimal. It is classified as a neo-noir film. This genre is all about a main character who is a "badass" but the audience knows little about, adding to the mysterious effect of the character. The most important was the plot. You at first think it is going one way, but then changes after we learn of Standard's debts he must pay. Everything must be put on hold before anyone can move on with their life.
2) Think critically about how the film was shot, directed, use of lighting, etc. What do you think was effective in the making of the film? What took away or could have been done differently to enhance the film?
The film was shot incredibly. Car movies are common, and sometimes can be boring because the same exact shots of cars flipping over and exploding are overused. But this movie introduces brand new cinematography that has never been before. Or at least I haven't. Lighting was sort of 80s-ish, with purple and blue lighting on the character's faces at night. The most effective was probably the cinematography. It is a great source for anyone who is looking for new ways to shoot, should watch. My favorite two shots were 1) Where "Kid" sees two thugs walking by in a parking garage. The camera is placed inside the car, in the passenger seat, looking out at the driver and the two thugs walking by. Then the car pulls in, all the while maintaing view of the thugs. My next favorite is when "Kid" is going to settle debts and wearing a mask to keep is identity hidden. The angle is from inside a pizza parlor, looking out, where we see "Kid" walk up to the door and stare inside, deciding what his next move would be. Keep a look out for those two when watching it. Another key factor was the music, the music was this kind of 80s synthesizer based soundtrack. It worked well with the theme and makes you want to listen the same music when you drive. Nothing could have been done differently. It was a great homage to noir films by Nicolas Refn.
3) What is you overall opinion of the film? Would you recommend it? Why/why not?
Highly recommend it. While the film is quite artsy and can be boring, not understandable, and "weird" in a way, it was fantastic because of each shot was taken into careful consideration and made the film art, instead of simply entertainment.
Thursday, February 2, 2012
The Last Farm Critique
1) In 50 words or less tell what the film was about.
The film was about an old man, who recently lost his wife, struggles to find purpose in the world without his wife. Eventually, the old man decides his place was, is and always will be with her, and he keeps true to that in the biggest way.
2) What was more important/memorable/significant? The plot or the characters? Why?
The most significant, in my opinion, was the ending burial scene. Everything that took place in the film was leading up to his end, and after multiple viewings, the burial scene still sends a wave of sadness, respect, and leaving with a new idea of death, love, and commitment.
3) What did you take away from the film?
What I mostly took away from it was a new perspective. Suicide was always a weird subject to me. I've never been to that point of depression, but I can understand how people go through it. I would think it would be one of the most frightening situations possible. But the Old man greets death with dignity and fearlessness, and he does this because of love. So sometimes death isn't a going away, but a coming to, a coming to something that someone lost in their living life, something that cannot be found in their living life.
The film was about an old man, who recently lost his wife, struggles to find purpose in the world without his wife. Eventually, the old man decides his place was, is and always will be with her, and he keeps true to that in the biggest way.
2) What was more important/memorable/significant? The plot or the characters? Why?
The most significant, in my opinion, was the ending burial scene. Everything that took place in the film was leading up to his end, and after multiple viewings, the burial scene still sends a wave of sadness, respect, and leaving with a new idea of death, love, and commitment.
3) What did you take away from the film?
What I mostly took away from it was a new perspective. Suicide was always a weird subject to me. I've never been to that point of depression, but I can understand how people go through it. I would think it would be one of the most frightening situations possible. But the Old man greets death with dignity and fearlessness, and he does this because of love. So sometimes death isn't a going away, but a coming to, a coming to something that someone lost in their living life, something that cannot be found in their living life.
Tuesday, January 31, 2012
Very Short Films Critique
2 Men
Most important was the narrator. He was the whole idea behind the film, he acted as a human brain and the thought process our brains go through when they see a certain event, such as two men running.
I'm a little bit more aware of my thought process now when I see something. That's what this film does, it makes you think of thinking.
My Best Friend is Sweating
This film takes to light when men get nervous and sweat very much during their wedding day. It takes a turn for the worse when the groom dies and turns to sweat.
The most significant was the groom. He was provided the best insight to what was happening, but then we realize nervousness takes over and turns into a giant puddle of sweat.
I don't really know what I would take away from this film. I think at most it just made me more aware of the most random stuff that I could use for inspiration and make a film out of it and make it as a crazy, and confusing as possible.
Glory at Sea Critique
1) Provide a brief description of the film.
The film is about a group of people who were recently victims of a terrible storm, which resulted in a flood, and multiple deaths of family members and friends came about. It all started with a man who tried to built a boat, after having lost his girlfriend, whom all we know about her is her name, Tess. The man begins building the boat, and has a slow start, but eventually, town members come join him, providing their most precious treasures to the effort of building the boat. The boat gets built, and the group sales off, with all those who built it. They sale into the night and till the next day. Out of nowhere, the man who began building the boat in the first place jumps in the water and starts searching for his drowned girlfriend. At the same time, the boat begins to crumble, and everyone but the Reverend fall into the water. The ending scene is all the people who built the boat embrace their loved ones.
2) What is the overall tone or mood of the film?
The overall mood in the beginning is a sense of curiosity and hope. No one has any idea why they are building a boat, they built it because they felt something that they "just knew" needed to be done. Towards the end, a sense of closure, happiness, and relief is the dominant theme as we see our protagonists finding hope again.
3) How does the dialog influence the film?
Dialogue wasn't common. It helped greatly because actions are much more powerful than words, so watching was more enjoyable. The lack of dialogue also let the viewer find their interpretation of the film, most importantly the ending because the ending is abstract, and with no dialogue as a guideline, makes the viewer think.
4) In what ways does the cinematography affect the film?
The cinematography was interesting. I felt like I was watching a cross between an actual hollywood film and a home movie. It wasn't too believable or realistic, but it gave about a "imaginative or dream-like" feeling to it, making it incredibly enjoyable.
5) What scene or part of a scene do you like the best? Why?
My favorite scene was the one where everyone fell into the water and then began embracing their lost loved ones. It brought a sense of closure, and allowed the characters to say good-bye, one last time. Personally, I thought the people died in the crashing of the boat, but they died with their family and friends and lovers, and they died together, so they are in a much better place.
6) What is your opinion of the film?
Great film. It brought back those memories of making forts out of pillows from the couch and the imagination that came along with it. The film contained a great metaphor for getting back on your feet after a disaster or hardship, and provided a colorful method on how to bounce back, even though it may not be the best option to take.
Friday, January 27, 2012
New Boy Critique
1) Provide a brief description of the film.
The film was about a young black boy, Joseph, who recently enrolled in a new school. At the school he is bullied by a boy throughout the class, but the teacher ignores it. Occasionally, the film flashes back to Joseph's past life in Africa, where his father was teacher and Joseph was a good student. However, we learn that Joseph's father was murdered by militants. During recess, back in the present, milk is thrown at Joseph and the other boy's attempt to start a fight. However, Joseph stands stall and stares down the bully, acting without violence. The teacher then has a talk with the three boys, only to be interrupted by a young girl named Hazel. Hazel tries to tell the teacher that the boys had been bullying Joseph and Joseph did nothing wrong. But the teacher dismisses Hazel, and Hazel talks back, causing the class and the three boys, including Joseph and the bully, to laugh together at the problems Hazel is causing.
2) What is the overall tone or mood of the film?
The beginning starts with a somewhat isolated and afraid feeling. It progresses into resentment for the bully and sympathy for Joseph. While watching the flashbacks and seeing Joseph's past life, we understand what Joseph went through, adding even more to the sympathetic mood towards Joseph. The film ends on a happy note, where we see Joseph and the bully can now relate, and hopefully coincide together in the future.
3) How does the dialog influence the film?
Dialogue affected greatly. When in the new school, Joseph rarely talks. He is quiet and the only people talking are those around him. However, when we see the flashbacks, he is talking and smiling quite a lot. This shows he once was comfortable, and understand why he is quite. At the end, we see Joseph smile and speak. The mere fact Joseph spoke showed he was comfortable with the situation and can find joy in life, even with the loss of his father.
4) In what ways does the cinematography affect the film?
The cinematography was not a major factor. Some shots of the teacher yelling at the student, where a students head was one corner of the shot, made it feel like as if the audience were the students sitting in the rows. Other than that, nothing jumped out.
5) What scene or part of a scene do you like the best? Why?
My favorite scene was where the bully was trying to fight Joseph at recess. We had just seen that Joseph's father was killed, and now the bully is trying to pick a fight with Joseph. Yet Joseph stands tall and looks the bully in the eye. He looked at him with the look of "Yeah, I've seen stuff you will never ever see." The stare was empowering and stopped the bully in his attempt to start a fight.
6) What is your opinion of the film?
I liked it. It's not something I would watch again. But it was a interesting story, one that people should see, but not more than once. I had a problem with the ending as it was cliché and did not seem logical. Somehow, the students magically became friends and the racist bully was nice. Just wasn't believable for me. However, I do recommend it as it does show the effects of events going in Sierra Leone and militants rising against their governments in Africa.
The film was about a young black boy, Joseph, who recently enrolled in a new school. At the school he is bullied by a boy throughout the class, but the teacher ignores it. Occasionally, the film flashes back to Joseph's past life in Africa, where his father was teacher and Joseph was a good student. However, we learn that Joseph's father was murdered by militants. During recess, back in the present, milk is thrown at Joseph and the other boy's attempt to start a fight. However, Joseph stands stall and stares down the bully, acting without violence. The teacher then has a talk with the three boys, only to be interrupted by a young girl named Hazel. Hazel tries to tell the teacher that the boys had been bullying Joseph and Joseph did nothing wrong. But the teacher dismisses Hazel, and Hazel talks back, causing the class and the three boys, including Joseph and the bully, to laugh together at the problems Hazel is causing.
2) What is the overall tone or mood of the film?
The beginning starts with a somewhat isolated and afraid feeling. It progresses into resentment for the bully and sympathy for Joseph. While watching the flashbacks and seeing Joseph's past life, we understand what Joseph went through, adding even more to the sympathetic mood towards Joseph. The film ends on a happy note, where we see Joseph and the bully can now relate, and hopefully coincide together in the future.
3) How does the dialog influence the film?
Dialogue affected greatly. When in the new school, Joseph rarely talks. He is quiet and the only people talking are those around him. However, when we see the flashbacks, he is talking and smiling quite a lot. This shows he once was comfortable, and understand why he is quite. At the end, we see Joseph smile and speak. The mere fact Joseph spoke showed he was comfortable with the situation and can find joy in life, even with the loss of his father.
4) In what ways does the cinematography affect the film?
The cinematography was not a major factor. Some shots of the teacher yelling at the student, where a students head was one corner of the shot, made it feel like as if the audience were the students sitting in the rows. Other than that, nothing jumped out.
5) What scene or part of a scene do you like the best? Why?
My favorite scene was where the bully was trying to fight Joseph at recess. We had just seen that Joseph's father was killed, and now the bully is trying to pick a fight with Joseph. Yet Joseph stands tall and looks the bully in the eye. He looked at him with the look of "Yeah, I've seen stuff you will never ever see." The stare was empowering and stopped the bully in his attempt to start a fight.
6) What is your opinion of the film?
I liked it. It's not something I would watch again. But it was a interesting story, one that people should see, but not more than once. I had a problem with the ending as it was cliché and did not seem logical. Somehow, the students magically became friends and the racist bully was nice. Just wasn't believable for me. However, I do recommend it as it does show the effects of events going in Sierra Leone and militants rising against their governments in Africa.
10 Minutes Critique
1) Provide a brief description of the film.
The film was about, at first, a man looking to get his photographs made, however, it then cuts to a young boy, named Memo, in Bosnia, who is the middle of a war. It starts out with him going to retrieve water, and walking through the compound he lives in. We see that the area is war torn and run down, with tired soldiers and people struggling for food. When the boy finally gets to the truck for water and bread, where people are scrambling, their compound comes under fire and people rush for safety. The boy, Memo, makes his way back to his own apartment where is family was staying to find them slain by gunfire.
2) What is the overall tone or mood of the film?
The tone of it was sad, but it also was critical of life in the western world, where safety is taken for granted. The way of presenting how it takes 10 minutes to produce some photos and in a place like Bosnia, 10 minutes could change your life.
3) How does the dialog influence the film?
The dialogue was not very influential as I thought it would be. But the film did not need it at all as the cinematography, and the idea of putting two completely different events in the same time frame was powerful enough. In fact, even if a little more dialogue was put in the film, it would have ruined it.
4) In what ways does the cinematography affect the film?
The best I have ever seen. The camera basically follows the boy the whole duration of the film and is one complete shot. It flowed perfectly and added to the already great idea of comparing western world to places where life and death is a daily struggle. The transitions were great as well, going from clock to clock.
5) What scene or part of a scene do you like the best? Why?
My favorite was just Memo, the boy, walking to get water. The flowing and panning of the camera was great. It felt like the audience was strolling along with Memo, on the trip to get water.
6) What is your opinion of the film?
My new second favorite short film. Right alongside, "Chief", this film brings to light something that has been put in the back, poorly lit area of society's mind. I would watch it again just to see the camera angle and watch how the shots flow in harmony with the boy. Great film, everyone should see it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)